Supposedly, There’s a Toucan Here
Inspiration can come from the least likely places. A person, an image, a landscape, a song, even a smell at a particular moment can settle in someone’s mind and grow with them, quietly nudging them down one path or another.
The truth is that we are often unaware of where our inspiration began. It may have come from a moment so unguarded that it passed almost unnoticed. And yet, that single instant can still mark a before and an after.
I like to think that something like that happened in Mindo in October 2023.
Elias and I had been waiting for hours for an Andean toucan to land on a feeder. Not merely near the feeder, of course, but on the exact spot where the light, the background and the bird might briefly come together for the photograph Elias had imagined.
The toucan was a frequent visitor. But, as wildlife so often does, it followed a completely different schedule from ours.
I don’t take photographs myself. I work in conservation, and I am convinced that conservation matters for the future: for my future, for yours and for the future of the children we unexpectedly met that afternoon.
They arrived while we were waiting, around eighteen of them. An excited class visiting Mindo with the Unidad Educativa San Francisco de Quito, or UESFQ. Vinicio, the owner of the location, had arranged the visit with the school, and on that particular day the group found Elias and me already there.
Elias was the photographer. I was the conservationist who suddenly had the attention of eighteen children at the same time. And all of us were waiting for a bird.
Embracing the Wait
There is a considerable difference between a 28-year-old deciding to wait four hours for a toucan and asking a group of children to do the same. These children knew very little about the bird, did not know when it might arrive and had no particular reason to believe that waiting for it mattered. Expecting them to sit quietly for hours was, to put it mildly, an ambitious plan.
I understood their restlessness. I felt it too, and I was supposed to be the patient one. I felt responsible for helping them understand why this waiting might be worthwhile.
Luckily, we had Elias’s images with us through his website, so I began showing the children some of the animals he had photographed elsewhere in the world: a puffin, a tiger and some of Africa’s iconic wildlife.
For a little while, no one was asking when the toucan would arrive.
Having eighteen children listen to me so closely turned out to be unexpectedly significant. Nobody was asking why I was showing them these animals. They simply wanted to know more.
I asked them in Spanish, “¿Saben cómo se llama este pájaro raro?” (Do you know what this strange bird is called?)
Some shook their heads. Then one child answered, quietly and a little nervously: “¿Es ese el pájaro frailecillo?” (Is that the puffin?)
The child remembered.
It was only the name of a bird, but it made me wonder: could one of these children eventually become part of the future of conservation? And even if that question reached too far, could one of them go home and repeat something they had heard? Could one photograph shown here, far from their homes in Quito, become a conversation at someone’s dinner table?
I still don’t know.
But that afternoon made me think more deliberately about what inspiration looks like before it’s recognised as such.
What Are We Waiting For?
At some point during the afternoon, one of the children asked the question everyone was thinking:
“What are we waiting for?”
The answer was the toucan, of course. But it is funny how a question that simple can stay with you. I have caught myself asking it in very different places and rooms since that day.
My working life does not look much like a cloud forest. I spend much of my time reading and reviewing documents: standards, legal analyses and the rules being developed for markets intended to reward people for keeping nature standing.
In that world, nature frequently arrives in the form of policies, metrics and politics. I believe in those tools. If I didn’t, I would not have spent so much of my professional life working with them. Rules, money and measurement help turn good intentions into commitments for which institutions can be held accountable.
But they also introduce a different kind of waiting. Governments, banks and companies make commitments to nature all the time. Much of my professional curiosity concerns what happens next: how a pledge on paper becomes something measurable on the ground, and why that transformation so often takes longer than anyone promised.
What are we waiting for?
Sometimes the honest answer is a regulation, a verification report or a budget line. Sometimes it is simply that not enough people are asking.
That afternoon in Mindo, however, nobody needed a hectare, a baseline or an indicator. Eighteen children gathered around a laptop needed something much simpler: something worth looking at and someone willing to explain why it mattered.
The Hardest Part of Conservation Is the Waiting
Here is something I did not expect to learn from a toucan. Without anyone planning it, those children were being asked to do one of the hardest things conservation asks of all of us: to wait for something we cannot control, on a schedule that is not ours, for a reason we may not yet fully understand.
The bird comes when the bird comes.
A forest protected today may not look visibly different tomorrow. A restored river can take years to demonstrate that the work was worthwhile. Many of the people who make conservation decisions will never know whether those decisions ultimately produced the result they intended. That is part of what makes conservation difficult to sell to a ministry, an investor or a ten-year-old. The reward may be real, but it arrives late, and rarely on cue.
What changed the mood in Mindo was not a lecture about patience. It was giving the waiting a story. Once the children knew what the toucan was, what other strange and extraordinary creatures shared the planet with it and why those animals were worth protecting, the waiting was no longer empty time. It had become anticipation.
There was also an irony I only noticed later.
I had been showing Ecuadorian children animals from the other side of the planet while we sat in a forest that people travel across the world to experience. How many children grow up able to name a lion long before they can name the birds outside their own window?
I do not say that as a criticism of the children or their school. The wildlife images that reach us most easily often come from far away. But the experience made me think that part of the job, for people like Elias and me, is to point the camera, and the conversation, back home.
Can Photography Move a Generation?
I want to be honest about what photography can accomplish.
I don’t think a photograph, on its own, protects anything. A picture of a toucan does not stop a road, fund a park ranger or change a land-use plan. I have read enough documents during my career to be suspicious of anyone who claims that a single image can save a species.
But I have also seen what an image can do that my documents cannot. A photograph travels. The children could not take the cloud forest home with them. They could not take the toucan, the puffin or the big cats. But they could take an image. They could show it at the dinner table, to a younger brother or to a grandmother who has never visited Mindo.
A photograph can turn “you had to be there” into “look at this”. And “look at this” is often where caring begins.
Watching Elias work that day also demonstrated something that is easily overlooked. People often think wildlife photography is about the fraction of a second in which the shutter clicks.
It isn’t.
It is also about everything that happens before that fraction of a second: researching the animal and its habitat, finding a responsible and ethical way to encounter it, reading the light and knowing where to stand while respecting the animal enough not to chase it. Sometimes it means travelling halfway across a country, leaving the familiar routes behind and asking local people whether they are willing to share access to land where the animal you’re searching for might be part of their everyday life. And throughout all of it, there is the understanding that the animal might simply not appear.
Good wildlife photography is, in its own way, a practice in many of the things conservation requires: patience, attention, humility and respect for something that owes us nothing.
All of that comes with responsibility, however. Images can mislead as easily as they can inspire. A perfect photograph of a bird on a branch tells us nothing about the road being planned two valleys away. It tells us nothing about the people caring for that forest who may never appear in the frame. It doesn’t even tell us if the bird was comfortable appearing in front of the lens.
A beautiful picture without context can make us complacent. If a place looks pristine and the subject looks at ease, we may assume that it must be fine.
That is why I do not believe the photograph is the end of the story. It is the invitation. The context is what keeps you there after you have accepted it.
One Child, One Image, One Question
I may never know whether that afternoon affected any of the children in Mindo. But I have seen something similar happen closer to home.
My nephew Benjamin was seven years old when he woke up at 7 a.m. on a Sunday to travel two hours from Quito into the Andean mountains. The purpose of the journey was to find a sword-billed hummingbird.
That morning gave Benjamin the opportunity to experience nature directly: to see the bird with his own eyes and to begin understanding why the landscapes and wildlife around him form part of a shared history.
Benjamin was asked to wait too, just like those children in Mindo had been. And despite being a remarkably patient seven-year-old, eventually the hours began to test him. But the bird came. At the very end of the morning, the sword-billed hummingbird appeared, and Benjamin’s excitement was impossible to contain.
The experience belonged to him. Nobody could manufacture the reaction for him or guarantee that it would leave a lasting mark. All we could do was create the opportunity. Three years later, he still remembers it:
I don’t know whether photography can move an entire generation, but I have watched wildlife images hold the attention of a class of children for an entire afternoon. I have seen one child wake up unreasonably early on a Sunday because there was a hummingbird somewhere in the mountains that he wanted to find.
Perhaps that is how a generation starts moving: one child, one image and one question asked out loud.
The Toucan, Finally
And back in Mindo, the toucan eventually came.
After all those hours, the bird landed exactly where it always landed, as if nothing unusual were happening. Elias managed to capture the images for which he had been waiting.
The children, however, did not see it. By the time the toucan arrived, they had gone.
That might sound like an unsuccessful ending at first. They had waited, and the anticipated reward had not arrived in time. But perhaps seeing the toucan was never the only point.
The children had spent an afternoon in the cloud forest. They had gathered around photographs of animals they had never encountered. One child had remembered the name of the puffin. They had asked questions, listened and gone home knowing a little more about wildlife than they had known when they arrived.
I hope they also went home feeling more connected to the place in which they live.
The toucan came. Just not on their schedule.
Why Wildview
That afternoon has become part of my purpose at Wildview. I want to contribute context beyond the photograph: the consequences beyond the moment and the reason an encounter matters after it has ended.
In the world of conservation finance, we sometimes talk about “additionality”: the difference an intervention makes beyond what would otherwise have happened. Here, I mean something more personal. I mean the “why this matters” that turns a beautiful image into something you carry home.
I have spent years working on the technical side of conservation. I still believe deeply in that work. Conservation needs standards, legal frameworks, finance, monitoring and accountability.
But the technical side only functions if enough people care in the first place. This journal is my small attempt to contribute to the caring part.
Maybe one of those eighteen children will eventually work in conservation in Ecuador. Maybe one of them went home that evening and told their family about a bird with a funny-coloured beak. Maybe none of them remembers the afternoon at all. I will probably never know, and I have made my peace with that.
Conservation is full of results we never get to see.
So the next time you find yourself waiting, for a bird, for change or for someone else to act, I invite you to borrow the children’s question, as I have done:
“What are we waiting for?”






